More Analyses and Post Hoc Analyses
Conclusions away from trends from inside the sexual regularity and you will level of sexual lovers have been similar when analyzing per survey year alone (eFigure 4 and you may eFigure 5 on the Supplement). From the article hoc analyses, a rise in sexual laziness and having zero sexual couples certainly dudes try noticed in extremely sociodemographic subgroups but not certainly one of gay or bisexual participants (sexual laziness: aOR for pattern, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.29-step 1.33; P = 0.05 for communications vs heterosexual participants; no sexual companion: aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-step 1.03; P = 0.009 to own communication) (eTable fifteen and you can eTable 16 on the Supplement). Furthermore, the fresh ong dudes are observed all over subgroups, even though trend don’t differ by sexual positioning (eTable 17 throughout the Complement). Into the multivariable logistic regression models modified to own sociodemographic parameters, also alterations in brand new proportion married, the brand new aORs towards pattern remained mainly just like those who work in the primary analyses to possess sexual laziness, zero sexual people, and weekly or even more sexual interest certainly men (eTable 18 regarding Enhance). New shipping regarding sexual volume and level of sexual people certainly one of professionals identifying while the gay, lesbian, otherwise bisexual try revealed during the eFigure 6 in the Supplement.
Dialogue
Using United states in the united states associate survey analysis, i estimated you to 30.9% of males and you can 19.1% of women aged 18 to 24 many years into the 2016-2018 advertised are sexually inactive previously year, with our size becoming comparable both in sexes some of those aged twenty five so you can 34 decades (fourteen.1% against several.6%) and you can thirty five so you can forty two years (8.0% against 8.5%).